Legal Opinion

Matter of Kern

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1990No. 02S00-8807-DI-634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

This case is before us on a Verified Complaint For Disciplinary Action charging William A. Kern, the Respondent herein, with one count of professional misconduct.

Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(b), this court appointed a Hearing Officer who has now tendered his findings of fact, conclusions and recommendation. The Respondent has petitioned for review of the same.

A review by this court of attorney disciplinary cases involves an examination of all matters presented before the court. This includes a review not only of the Hearing Officer's report but…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matter of HamptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Matter of StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Matter of MoerleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Matter of WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re ConnIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Matter of BukerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API