In Re Conn
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent, Gene E. Conn, was convicted and imprisoned in 1997 for sexual exploitation of minors. While he was under federal investigation for that crime in 1995, he failed in his duty to amend his application to the Indiana bar to reveal that investigation. Today we approve a Conditional Agreement for Discipline between the respondent and the Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11. Our approval of this agreement will result in respondent’s suspension from the practice of law for a minimum of two years for…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of BukerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of CharosIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of VermaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
4Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Mask v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- In re SingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In the Matter of RaquetIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.