Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Logsdon
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided July 19, 1955No. Civ. No. 611PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, District Judge.
This is a civil action to recover a large sum of money representing an alleged overdraft of the bank account of the defendant. Subsequent to the filing of this suit the defendant was jointly indicted with the cashier of his bank for willful misapplication of funds in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 656.
Plaintiff has made a request for admissions under Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., inquiring if the defendant signed and issued certain checks that resulted in the alleged overdraft of his account. Defendant refused to respond to the request on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Quinn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Meyer v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Mayo v. FordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.