Legal Opinion
De Archibold v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 20, 2003No. 02-147 CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 Plaintiffs seek damages for unpaid employment benefits that they claim entitlement to under Panamanian law. See Amended Complaint (Am. Compl. at 4-5). For the following reasons, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss and TRANSFERS the case to the District Court for the Northern District of Texas.2
I. Background3
Plaintiffs are former employees of the Army Air Force Exchange Service…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Steinberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- De Archibold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Keehn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.