Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 24, 2009No. 09-59 CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Chief Judge.
Before the court is a Complaint, filed by plaintiff, Mr. Michael A. Steinberg (plaintiff or Mr. Steinberg), on February 2, 2009, asserting breach of contract against the government (government, United States or defendant) on the grounds of promissory estoppel. Compl. ¶2. Plaintiff seeks to recover travel costs incurred during his trip to Washington, DC, to attend the 2009 presidential inauguration ceremonies. Pl.’s Compl. ¶ 26. On April 3, 2009, defendant moved to dismiss Mr. Steinberg’s Complaint on the grounds that this court lacked jurisdiction to hear…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Terry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Thaler v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.