People v. Roberts
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUFFY, J.
We address in this case whether the evidence was sufficient for the court to find that a prior felony conviction of second degree assault from *1112the State of Washington constituted a strike for purposes of imposing an enhanced punishment under the “Three Strikes” law. This question requires us in turn to determine the admissibility of (1) the transcript of the Washington prosecutor’s recitation of the alleged facts underlying the crime, which was received under the adoptive admission exception to the hearsay rule, and (2) the transcripts of the unsworn statements of others made…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. OehmigenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. SampleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. DenardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.