In re Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Jamall Brown was charged with assault with a deadly weapon and vandalism. The information contained a prior strike allegation asserting that Brown had previously suffered a juvenile adjudication for robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211. After the jury convicted Brown of vandalism, he discussed the strike allegation with his attorney and agreed to admit the strike. As a result of the admission, the trial court doubled Brown’s prison term.
Following his conviction, Brown’s appellate counsel obtained the record of the juvenile proceedings and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BurnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re MazurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. Winters CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- The People v. Shepard CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2013