Legal Opinion

Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1922No. 17105PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHovey, J.

— Respondent recovered judgment upon a

policy of fire insurance issued in its favor as mortgagee by appellant upon property situated in the state of Oregon. The judgment was entered after a demurrer had been sustained to defenses set up by appellant in its answer and the appellant had refused to plead further. At the time the policy was issued, the property belonged to Joseph W. Humphrey, and thereafter the mortgage was foreclosed and the property bid in by respondent for the full amount secured and was held subject to redemption at the time the fire occurred. No proofs of loss were made by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Dodge v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. Carlson v. Presbyterian Board of ReliefSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Hardy v. HerriottWashington Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Malvaney v. YagerMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Brown v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Assn.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Great American InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API