Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rowell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 13, 1946No. 5 Div. 415PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a petition for mandamus to review the ruling of the trial court on two motions made in a cause in which petitioner is plaintiff and William D. Walls as an individual doing business under the name of Blue Bird Cab Company is the defendant.

Motion No. 1 relates to the refusal of the court to require defendant to answer interrogatories Nos. 23, 25, 28, 30, 31, 38 and 51, propounded by plaintiff to defendant under section 477, Title 7, Code.

Motion No. 2 relates to the refusal of the court to direct defendant to produce in court the documents referred to and described in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Culver v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Collins v. Mobile O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Ex Parte HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Peoples v. SeamonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Ex Parte ThackstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Brunson v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API