Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-1143PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania resident and a former client of defendant Kidder, Peabody & Company (“Kidder, Peabody”), a Delaware corporation, charges that she lost substantial amounts of money as a result of unauthorized transactions in her account and the payment of funds from her account over her forged signature on Visa checks. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 due to the diversity of citizenship between the parties.
Presently before the Court is defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, we will…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warren v. ShookSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Asian Intern. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Congress Industries, Inc. v. Federal Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- First National Bank v. Duncan Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
- Rosenblum v. AnglimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. And Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Lichtenstein v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Nisenzon v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pinasco v. AraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.