Legal Opinion

Physio-Medical College v. Wilkinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1886No. 12,082PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The complaint in this case is in two paragraphs. The facts found by the jury in their special verdict show that the verdict and judgment rest exclusively upon the first paragraph. This is to all intents and purposes conceded in the briefs.

The burden of the appellant’s argument is directed against the complaint, which is questioned here by assigning as error, “ that the complaint does not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.”

We will consider only the first paragraph, as the appellees concede that there are no facts found by the jury ■which would ■sustain a judgment on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Townshend v. TownshendCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  2. Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Crouse v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hardenbrook v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dibble v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Raymond v. WathenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sheets v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API