Legal Opinion

Pennmark Resources Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 2000No. 92,559PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

T1 After Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corporation (hereinafter, LDNG) refused to turn over operations of a waterflood unit to Penn-mark Resources Company (Pennmark), Pennmark asked the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (the Commission) to enforce. the provisions of its order creating the Northwest Flats Unit by examining the procedures followed and the results recorded in a 1997 election concerning the unit operator. The validity of that election, and the extent of the Commission's authority concerning it are at the heart of this appeal.

Underlying Events

2 In the late 19703, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Sautbine v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ESTRADA v. KRIZCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. Chaparral Energy, L.L.C. v. C.E. Harmon Oil, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. RANGER ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
  4. B & W Operating, L.L.C. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. ESTRADA v. KRIZCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API