Legal Opinion
ESTRADA v. KRIZ
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 29, 2015No. 112,453PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge.
T 1 Plaintiff{/Appellant Phillip Estrada (Estrada) appeals the trial court's Order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Ap-pellees Dennis Kriz, Hodges Transport, Mid-America Pallet, LLC, et al. (collectively, Defendants). Defendants moved for dismissal "based upon [Estrada's] failure to plead [fraud] with particularity, the Doctrine of Laches and the Doctrine of Equitable Estop- pel." Based on our review, we conclude Estrada's veil-piercing theory is not subject to dismissal on the basis of any failure to plead fraud with particularity; Estrada has…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berry v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- ESTRADA v. KRIZCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015