Legal Opinion
Doe v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 12, 2015No. 2013-496PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The petitioner, John Doe, appeals an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) granting summary judgment for the respondent, the State of New Hampshire, on the petitioner’s declaratory judgment action, which sought a ruling that RSA chapter 651-B is unconstitutional, as applied to him, because it violates the prohibition against retrospective laws and the Due Process Clause of the New Hampshire Constitution. See RSA ch. 651-B (2007 & Supp. 2014). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I
There are no material facts in dispute. In 1987, the petitioner pleaded guilty to two counts of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John Does v. Richard SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- John Doe v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Millard v. RankinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.