Legal Opinion

Soper v. Hammond Lumber Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 14, 1925No. 17278PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARTRIDGE, District Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries, designated by plaintiff a “complaint by a seaman under the Railroad Employers’ Liability Law, 35 Stat. 65” (being Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665). The allegations are that plaintiff was employed as able seaman on the Covena, a ship engaged in interstate commerce, and that while he was engaged in^ loading the vessel a pile of lumber on shore fell upon and injured him.

The action is headed as above described, according to plaintiff’s brief, upon the theory that section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Hughes v. Alaska S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Esteves v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Kulczyk v. Rockport S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
  4. Lindh v. Booth Fisheries Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
  5. Ryan v. Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API