Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 19, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00286Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 LAWRENCE RYAN, Case No. 33::1199--ccvv--0000228866--MMMMDD--CWLGBC 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES INC., 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 I. SUMMARY 13 Plaintiff Lawrence Ryan asserts claims for sexual harassment based on a hostile 14 work environment and retaliation. (ECF No. 1.) Before the Court is Defendant Barrick 15 Goldstrike Mines, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment (“Motion”), contending that Plaintiff 16 cannot meet his burden nor demonstrate a question of material fact. (ECF No. 26.)1 17 Because the Court finds…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.