State v. Tucker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.
¶ 1. James Hubert *699Tucker, Jr. (Tucker) seeks review of an order of the court of appeals, affirming the circuit court's denial of his motion for sentence modification under Wis. Stat. § 809.30(2)(h) (2001-02).1 We review this case to determine whether the reductions in maximum penalties for the crimes of possession with intent to deliver cocaine and felony bail-jumping, set forth in the truth-in-sentencing provisions of 2001 Wis. Act 109 (TIS-II), constitute new factors in regard to a sentence modification motion, where the original sentences were imposed in accord with 1997 Wis. Act 283…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. LechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Fox Ex Rel. Fricker v. Catholic Knights Insurance SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- All Star Rent a Car, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- All Star Rent a Car, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.