Legal Opinion
State v. Stenklyft
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 2005No. 2003AP1533-CRPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJon P Wilcox, J.
¶_1. This case is before the *492court on a motion to bypass, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 808.05 (2003-04)1 and Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.60. The State appeals from a Dane County Circuit Court, Daniel R. Moeser, Judge, order, granting the petition of the defendant, David Stenklyft, for sentence adjustment under Wis. Stat. § 973.195 and an order denying the State's motion for reconsideration.
I. ISSUES
¶ 2. The State asserts that the circuit court proceeded under an incorrect theory of law in granting Stenklyft's petition. The following issues are presented on appeal: 1) Does § 973.195 apply to inmates…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Richard L. Grennier v. Matthew J. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Landwehr v. LandwehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Christopher W. YakichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.