Feige v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
The plaintiff brought this action before a justice of the peace, to recover damages for goods consigned to him, which were burned in defendant’s freight-house on the night of October 39, 1883.
In the circuit court the case was tried without a jury, and resulted in- a judgment for defendant. The court made a written, finding of facts, and of his conclusions of law thereon, which are embodied in the record before us.
There are three assignments of error, all of which raise the same question, namely, the right of defendant to a judgment upon the record.
The goods in question were in the freight…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- McMillan v. Mich. S. & N. I. R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Shannon v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People v. MarxhausenMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Black v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Graham v. Muskegon County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Gladstone v. ThroopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.