Legal Opinion
Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 8, 2010No. AC 30836PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiff, Harry Kraiza, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the denial of his subdivision application *480by the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Hartland (commission).1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) affirmed the commission’s determination that the length of Eastwood Drive should be considered when evaluating his application, (2) affirmed the commission’s finding that Eastwood Drive is a dead-end street and (3) rejected his claim that the commission arbitrarily reinterpreted its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Quality Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Com'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Kraiza v. Planning and Zoning Commission of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Paul v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Kraiza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010