Legal Opinion
Kalman v. Hutcheson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 26, 1971No. 6061Published
1Opinion of the Court
111 N.H. 36 (1971)
AARON KALMAN
v.
PHILO A. HUTCHESON & a.
No. 6061.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
February 26, 1971.
Aaron Kalman, pro se and Sumner F. Kalman, attorney-in-fact (Sumner F. Kalman by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.
Frederick W. Murdock, Jr., of Massachusetts, for defendant Philo A. Hutcheson and Shute, Engle & Frasier, for the defendants Philo A. Hutcheson and Henry A. Hubbard.
2Per curiam
This is a petition by the plaintiff seeking an order that the defendants remove certain obstructions to the flow of a brook and that he be awarded damages. The defendant Hubbard filed an answer…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Sakansky v. WeinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Gelinas v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
- Bogosian v. FineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955
- McCleary v. LourieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Ucietowski v. NovakSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.