McCleary v. Lourie
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
There being no specific grant to the plaintiffs of an easement in the grove, nor express covenant with respect to its use, the plaintiffs’ interest therein, if any, under the facts in this case must be established by way of estoppel.
Mrs. Thayer, plaintiffs’ grantor, caused the Point to be surveyed and plotted pursuant to a purpose to develop White Birch Point as an exclusive summer colony. It is clear from the character of such an enterprise and the location and situation of the property, as disclosed by the survey and plan, that the lake was regarded as an essential feature of the proposed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglass v. Belknap Springs Land Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- Horne v. HutchinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- Walker v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
3Cited by14 opinions
- Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
- Arthur v. Lake Tansi Village, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Williams Realty Co. v. RobeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Goetz v. Knoxville Power & Light Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Forister v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.