Legal Opinion

Schork v. Huber

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1983PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from an opinion by the Court of Appeals affirming the circuit court which granted a partial summary judgment in an action for negligence determining that the parents of a child cannot recover the costs of rearing a child born pursuant to an unsuccessful sterilization. We affirm.

Dr. Huber performed a sterilization procedure on Sharon A. Schork in 1977, assuring her that such a procedure was 99 percent effective in preventing pregnancy. After sterilization, she returned to the doctor for a checkup, and he advised her she was sterile. Shortly thereafter she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Soto Cabral v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  4. James G. v. CasertaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Jones v. MalinowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API