Legal Opinion
Currington v. Polaroid Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 28, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-3514-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SKINNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a black male, has brought suit against Polaroid alleging that his layoff on September 3, 1974, was an act of racial discrimination in employment in. violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendant has moved to dismiss the Title VII' claim for failure to file suit within 90. days of receiving notice of right to sue from the EEOC. Defendant has moved to dismiss the claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 for failure to comply with the applicable state statute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Curran v. Portland Superintending School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1977
- Matilde R. Ramirez De Arellano v. Jose A. Alvarez De Choudens, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Roberto Graffals Gonzalez v. Ramon Garcia SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Sims v. Order of United Commercial Travellers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
- Bertram M. HADFIELD, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the MITRE CORP. and Haig H. Hedison, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alton Roy DAUGHTRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KING’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Black v. Brown UniversityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Isaac v. Harvard UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984