Legal Opinion
Farnham v. Daar, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided June 28, 1960No. 12351PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. JASPER SMITH, District Judge.
This is a common law action for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff on October 16, 1956, while he was employed by Swift & Company. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff is not the real party in interest under Rule 17(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and that the action should be maintained by plaintiff’s employer, Swift & Company. Certain facts relevant to the pending motion are undisputed.
At the time of the injury plaintiff was a resident of the State of Kansas and an employee of the Kansas City, Kansas,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Scott v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Overcash v. Yellow Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Whitaker v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Rosenfeld v. Continental Building Operating CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Langston v. HaydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hughes v. McMenamonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Perry v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- H. R. Kimbrell and Dean Kimbrell, a Minor, by Next Friend and Father, H. R. Kimbrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- H. R. Kimbrell and Dean Kimbrell, a Minor, by Next Friend and Father, H. R. Kimbrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.