Legal Opinion · Dissent

H. R. Kimbrell and Dean Kimbrell, a Minor, by Next Friend and Father, H. R. Kimbrell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1962No. 14515Published

1Dissent

SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Chief Judge

(dissenting).

I am of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be reversed.

It appears to be settled law that whether the plaintiff has a cause of action under the Federal Torts Claims Act is determined by the law of the state. Accordingly, we look to Section 50-914, Tennessee Code Annotated, to determine that question and to see in whom the right exists.

The Tennessee statute provides that the injured employee has a right of action against the third party tortfeasor and that the action to enforce this claim must be instituted within one year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gertrude D. Willis v. Weil Pump CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Wilson v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Farnham v. Daar, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960
  4. Willis v. Weil Pump Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. Dinardo v. Consumers Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API