Legal Opinion
Royal Neighbors of America v. Fortenberry
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 14, 1926No. 6 Div. 454PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The trial was had upon counts 3, 4, 5, and 7, -based on an alleged contract to insure and the breach thereof in the failure to issue a policy of insurance made payable pursuant to the application. Each of the counts stated a good cause of action. L. & L. & C. Ins. Co. v. McCree, 98 So. 880, 210 Ala. 559, 561. .
The evidence discloses that the application for insurance was of date April 4, 1923, the applicant was initiated into the lodge as a beneficial member on April 5th, the required certificate of good health was given by its physician on the 9th of that month, the application and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Cherokee Life Ins, Co. v. BrannumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Zayc v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Gillilan v. Federated Guar. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Fourth Nat. Bank v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.