Wells v. Gulf Refining Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Two questions are raised in this court:
First, that one of the findings of the court was not supported by substantial evidence. The appellant did not object or except to the finding made by the district court, nor did he request a finding on the same subject, -or otherwise raise in the district court the question of the insufficiency of the evidence to support said finding. Under this state of the record, the supreme court is not authorized to 'review the evidence to ascertain whether 'the finding is supported by substantial evidence.
If it is desired to have reviewed by this, court the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- American Inv. Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Alexander Hamilton Institute v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Williams v. KempNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Oberg v. ObergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Ritter-Walker Co. v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Selby v. TolbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Witherspoon v. BrummettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.