Legal Opinion

Barfield v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1923No. 4 Div. 789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The appellants were convicted of having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors.

The evidence for the state tended to show: That A. H. May, the sheriff of Houston county, in company with U. G. Watford and H. C. Adams, saw the defendants operating a still on Mercer creek in Houston county. The sheriff and those with him. reached the creek about 3 o’clock in the afternoon and went to a bluff above the-'creek in about 30 yards of the defendants, and concealed themselves and watched the defendants for about an hour and a half. “That Willie and Grady had a tub, toting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Carr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API