Barfield v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The appellants were convicted of having in possession a still to be used for manufacturing prohibited liquors.
The evidence for the state tended to show: That A. H. May, the sheriff of Houston county, in company with U. G. Watford and H. C. Adams, saw the defendants operating a still on Mercer creek in Houston county. The sheriff and those with him. reached the creek about 3 o’clock in the afternoon and went to a bluff above the-'creek in about 30 yards of the defendants, and concealed themselves and watched the defendants for about an hour and a half. “That Willie and Grady had a tub, toting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Carr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931