Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1926No. 7 Div. 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of “attempting to distill prohibited liquors,” etc.

'What was said by the defendant at the time of his arrest, at the scene, and upon the occasion, of the alleged crime, was admissible as a part of the res gestse. Barfield et al. v. State, 97 So. 378, 19 Ala. App. 374; Turner v. State, 85 So. 849, 17 Ala. App. 514. True, these statements were in the nature of a confession or an admission of guilt, but this in no wise alters the propriety of their admission in evidence under the principle named," even though there had been first offered no sufficient…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. McCullars v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Barfield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Turner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stain v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Sauls v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Sherman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Hall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. State v. SaltzmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API