Legal Opinion
Stephanie Lampe v. Kirk Kash
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2013No. 12-4487PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Due process entitled Stephanie Lampe to notice and an opportunity for a hearing before a bankruptcy court extinguished her $25,000 judgment. Does notice to a lawyer who represented her eight years earlier, but no longer represents her, satisfy this obligation?
In 2004, Stephanie Lampe won a $25,000 judgment against Kirk Kash. Kash could not pay this debt or for that matter many of his other debts. He sought bankruptcy protection in 2012.
When he submitted a list of creditors’ names and addresses to the court, as Bankruptcy Rule 1007(a) requires, Kash omitted Lampe’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- The Keene Group, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Ming Yang v. City of Wyoming, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Roberts v. GirderDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
- First Floor Living LLC v. City of Cleveland, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- In re StewardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.