Legal Opinion
Ming Yang v. City of Wyoming, Mich.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2015No. 14-1846PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J., joined by Gilman, J.,
CLAY, J. (pp. 606-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
For 'one reason or another, Ming Kuo and Julie Yang did not keep up their commercial property in Wyoming, Michigan. Neglect led to disrepair, which led by all appearances to abandonment and the safety risks that go with it. The city tried to contact the couple about the necessary fixes, but to no avail. After the last of the notices, the city leveled the building. The Yangs noticed that development and filed this § 1983 action in response, alleging that the city failed to provide them with sufficient…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- The Keene Group, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Roberts v. GirderDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2017
- First Floor Living LLC v. City of Cleveland, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. v. BARBARA NINA DAVISDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- CDDM Corporation v. Lansing, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.