Legal Opinion
Patterson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 11, 1958No. Nos. 302, 303, 305, 306, Dockets 23668, 23669, 23854, 23855PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
These four decrees, entered by Dimock, J., Kaufman, J., Palmieri, J., and Bicks, J., in the order in which the titles are arranged herein, dismissed libels in personam to recover for injuries suffered by civil employees of the United States, upon ships, owned and operated by the United States. Patterson is the administrator of one, Doody, who was killed while employed as a machinist on a ship owned and operated by the War Shipping Administration although he was not employed “through” that Administration, and was not therefore covered *703by the “Clarification Act” of 1943 (50…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. MarineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Inland Waterways Corp. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ben Perlmutter and Bernice Perlmutter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Perlmutters, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- John William Mills v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- DeSousa v. Panama Canal CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Cordero v. Panama Canal CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Arrufat v. Panama Canal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.