Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Lascy

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1941No. Civ. 11168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs Carl G. Sorensen and Mary M. Sorensen, his wife, brought this action against B. P. Arata and A. Lascy to recover a $500 deposit paid by them to Lascy on the purchase price of certain real property owned by Arata in San Mateo County. Plaintiffs contended that Lascy, a real estate agent, and Arata had falsely represented that the land contained 120,000 square feet, when in fact it contained but 83,998 square feet. Defendant Arata filed a cross-complaint in which he sought recovery of the $500 from Lascy. The court found that plaintiffs were entitled to no relief, and that Arata was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. La Societe Francaise D'Epargnes et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HildebrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Trask v. SeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Diaz v. Prof'l Cmty. Mgmt., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Brooms v. BroomsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API