Sorensen v. Lascy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiffs Carl G. Sorensen and Mary M. Sorensen, his wife, brought this action against B. P. Arata and A. Lascy to recover a $500 deposit paid by them to Lascy on the purchase price of certain real property owned by Arata in San Mateo County. Plaintiffs contended that Lascy, a real estate agent, and Arata had falsely represented that the land contained 120,000 square feet, when in fact it contained but 83,998 square feet. Defendant Arata filed a cross-complaint in which he sought recovery of the $500 from Lascy. The court found that plaintiffs were entitled to no relief, and that Arata was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VizelichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- La Societe Francaise D'Epargnes et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HildebrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Trask v. SeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
- Diaz v. Prof'l Cmty. Mgmt., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Brooms v. BroomsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.