Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hildebrand

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1965No. Civ. 27764PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

This appeal is by defendants Hildebrand, Bills, McLeod, Daggett, Dragmire, Bockhold and the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (appellants) from a consent judgment for a permanent injunction rendered and entered in favor of plaintiffs The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company and Southern Pacific Company, respondents herein.

Respondents’ amended complaints (the originals were filed July 23, 1959) allege that appellants Hildebrand, Bills, McLeod and Daggett were attorneys licensed to practice law in the State of California; that the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen is an international labor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Baker v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & BaerwitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Kenworthy v. HaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. John Siebel Associates v. KeeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Cofield v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API