Legal Opinion
Trask v. See
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1958No. 4058; No. 4060PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
In an action in the circuit court of the first circuit filed by Arthur K. Trask, plaintiff, against Tam See, defendant, and James K. Murakami, auditor of the City and County of Honolulu, garnishee, the court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, pursuant to a verdict of the jury. The defendant and the garnishee took separate appeals to this court from the judgment, and the plaintiff moved to dismiss both appeals. The appeal of the defendant is docketed as No. 4058 and that of the garnishee as No. 4060.
MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S APPEAL.
The motion is made on the ground that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Cushing v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Sorensen v. LascyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In re the Estate of BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Ueoka v. SzymanskiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Rosa v. CWJ Contractors, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bagalay v. Lahaina Restoration FoundationHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Lee v. Puamana Community Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.