Legal Opinion

Long v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1920No. A-3377PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County’, N. E. McNeill, Judge. E. L. Long was convicted of a second violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals.

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, E. L. Long, was convicted of having on-the 20th day of August, 1917, intoxicating liquors in h-is possession with the intent to sell, barter, give away, and otherwise dispose and furnish the same in violation of the prohibitory liquor laws of the state, and alleging ..said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted of said offense in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals.

The record shows that at the close of the case for the state, and again at the lose of the whole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McAlester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. State v. ZounickWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nelson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Arbuckle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API