Legal Opinion

Long v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1920No. A-3378Published

Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. E. L. Long was convicted' of a second violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM..

Plaintiff in error, E. L. Long, was convicted of having on the 9th day of October, 1917, intoxicating liquors in his possession with the intent to sell the same and alleging said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917, of the same offense. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals. This is a companion case of Long v. State, 17 Okla. Cr.-, 192 Pac. 427. this day decided. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on the same exceptions, and the judgment must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McAlester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API