Legal Opinion
Vincent Demarco, Belle Pomerantz and Mary Roth, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the Complaint, Anthony Grandinetti, Ai Langer, Angela Bennetti, Celia Israel, Stanley F. Harrison, Jr., Harold K. Stearns, and Helen Stearns v. Robert B. Edens, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products, Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard Roe, the Names John Doe and Richard Roe Being Fictitious, the True Names of Said Being Unknown to the Parties Intended Being More Fully Described in the Complaint
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 1968No. 31068Published
1Opinion of the Court
390 F.2d 836
Vincent DEMARCO, Belle Pomerantz and Mary Roth, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert B. EDENS, Martin Lasher, Precision Metal Products,
Inc., Philip Tashman, Harry Schwartz, John Doe and Richard
Roe, the names John Doe and Richard Roe being fictitious,
the true names of said defendants being unknown to
plaintiffs, the parties intended being more fully described
in the complaint, Defendants-Appellees.
Anthony GRANDINETTI, AI Langer, Angela Bennetti, celia
Israel, Stanley F. Harrison, Jr., Harold K.
Stearns, and Helen Stearns,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
- Neil Rogen v. Ilikon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Schillner v. H. Vaughan Clarke & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.