Legal Opinion

Abbadessa v. Tindall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1991No. WD 44099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Appellants Albert and Carol Abbadessa and Robert M. and Barbara Wilhite (“appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s order overruling their post-trial motion seeking to set aside judgment for irregularity pursuant to the provisions of Section 511.250, RSMo. 1986.1 Judgment affirmed. This cause was previously before this court in Abbadessa v. Tindall, 763 S.W.2d 178 (Mo.App.1988) (“Abbadessa I”).

Although the history of this cause is lengthy, it is essential to an understanding of the issues presently before this court. Appellants filed suit against Dale Tindall for common…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beauregard F. Birdwell v. Hazelwood School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Senn v. Manchester Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. DandurandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Rohwer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Brown v. General Motors Assembly DivisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manning v. FedotinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Spino v. BhaktaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API