Legal Opinion
Ramilo v. Department of Justice
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 20, 1998No. CIV. 97-00719 ACKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
BAY, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
In March of 1994, petitioner Angelita Ram-ilo (“petitioner”), a naturalized U.S. citizen, filed a visa petition on behalf of her husband Roberto Castillo Ramilo (“Roberto”) seeking to obtain a preferential immigrant visa pursuant to § 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b)(2)(A)(i). On February 9, 1995, the district director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) denied the visa petition.
On June 7, 1995, petitioner filed a second visa petition on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tongatapu Woodcraft Hawaii, Ltd. v. Sam I. Feldman, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ramsis Ghaly, Dr. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Systronics Corp. v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Cherewick v. State Farm Fire and CasualtyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020