Legal Opinion
In Re Calpine Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2007No. 19-22542PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BROUGHT UNDER RULE 60(b) FOR RELIEF FROM THE ORDER APPROVING THE SALE OF CERTAIN TURBINES
BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of Axford Consulting (“Axford”) pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 60(b)”) for relief from an order of this Court so that Axford may pursue a claim for a 3% broker fee of approximately $1,440,000 for services allegedly provided to Calpine Corporation (“Calpine” or “Debtors”).
On October 13, 2006, Debtors filed a motion for entry of an order approving bidding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Gollust v. MendellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Spiegel Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholas v. Oren (In Re Nicholas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In Re SandersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- In Re WassahUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- In Re PT-1 Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009