Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Mason County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. 76101-9PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Sanders, J.

On February 24, 2001, registered sex offender Joseph Rosenow raped and murdered Jennie Mae Osborn. Osborn’s parents sued Mason County for failing to warn them of Rosenow’s presence. The superior court denied Mason County’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals, Division Two, affirmed the superior court, holding Mason County had a duty to warn the Osborns of Rosenow’s presence under the rescue doctrine. We hold that Mason County had no duty to warn the Osborns because they did not rely on a promise to warn and Jennie Mae Osborn was not a foreseeable victim.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Wash. Emp. SEC. Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communications CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Osborn v. Mason CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API