Legal Opinion

Retan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for 830,000 damages for negligent injuries. The negligence complained of was in allowing a sidewalk which crosses defendant’s main track, and extends along the side of a public street in the village of Hudson, to become out of repair, and dangerous to public travel, and by means of which the plaintiff’s foot was caught and fastened in said walk between one of the planks and one of the rails of defendant’s track, and while being so held one of defendant’s trains of cars ran over him, cutting off' both his feet.

The main track of defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cross v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Lombar v. Village (Mich. 5-8-1891)Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Nichols' Adm'r v. W. O. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  5. Stewart v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bunton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Ribich v. Lake Superior Smelting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API