Legal Opinion

Vickery v. McCormick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1889No. 13,639PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

McCormick sued Vickery, Cooper & Co. to recover damages alleged to have resulted to him on account of the failure of the defendants to comply with a written contract, by the terms of which they had agreed to deliver a large quantity of lumber to the plaintiff, at Evansville, Indiana.

It appeared that the plaintiff had entered into a contract with the State of Indiana for the construction of a hospital for the insane at Evansville. His contract with the State required him to use a large quantity of white-oak lumber, of a certain grade and quality, in the construction of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Capen v. De Steiger Glass Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollerbachIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. HascallIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Adam & SteinbruggeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. J. P. Smith Shoe Co. v. Curme-Feltman Shoe Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Rahm v. DeigIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API