Legal Opinion
Michael Nichols v. Michael Bowersox
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1999No. 97-3639, 97-3640PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
In these consolidated cases, Michael Nichols and Richard L. Crane (together *1070referred to as “petitioners”) appeal from final judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri dismissing their respective petitions for writs of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Nichols v. Bowersox, No. 97-0666-CV-W-3-P (W.D.Mo. Aug. 20, 1997); Crane v. Dormire, No. 97-0673-CV-W-3-P (W.D.Mo. Aug. 20, 1997). For reversal, they argue that the district court erred in dismissing their petitions as untimely filed under the one-year…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Michael Nichols v. Michael Bowersox Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Richard L. Crane v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of MoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Libby v. Corrections, ME CommCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- No. 98-2215Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999