Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 17, 1999No. 98-2215PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Scott N. Rogers appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence and set aside his conviction. The court held that his motion was untimely under the limitations period imposed in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (Apr. 24, 1996), which allows prisoners one year from the date on which their convictions became final to file motions under § 2255. As interpreted by the district court (following the model of several other circuit courts of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. AlbertiniSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Donald Ray Patterson v. Terry L. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- D'Juan Bronaugh v. State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ronald Washington, A.K.A. Boo Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HurstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.