Legal Opinion
Michael Nichols v. Michael Bowersox Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, Richard L. Crane v. Dave Dormire, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, State of Mo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1999No. 97-3639PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
172 F.3d 1068
Michael NICHOLS, Appellant,
v.
Michael BOWERSOX; Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of
the State of Missouri, Appellees.
Richard L. Crane, Appellant,
v.
Dave Dormire, Superintendent; Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon,
Attorney General, State of MO, Appellees.
Nos. 97-3639, 97-3640.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 23, 1998.
Decided April 13, 1999.
Michael J. Elston, Kansas City, MO, argued, for Appellants.
Cassandra K. Dolgin, Jefferson City, MO, argued (Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, on the brief), for Appellees.
Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Beam; Dissent · Arnold.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mufid Al-Din, Also Known as Charles A. Parker v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999