Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Lancaster

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1923No. 396-3731PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, P. J.

Rogers & Adams, plaintiff in error, sued J. L. Lancaster and O. L. Wallace, receivers of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, defendants in error, and the Panhandle & Santa Ifé Railway Company, to recover damages to a carload of mules alleged to have resulted from rough handling and delay in transportation. The mules were shipped from El Paso to Chilli-cothe for sale on the market there. The route from El 'Paso to Sweetwater was *661over the line of railroad operated by said receivers. When the mules arrived at Sweet-water plaintiffs in error diverted them to Adrian, Tex., claiming that they were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. RubyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Southern Pacific Railway Co. v. R. E. Maddox & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HapgoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co. v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Walsh v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API