Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Beaty

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1892No. 7049PublishedCited by 80 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Judge,

Section B. — This suit is for partition of the Joseph L. Wilson 640 acres survey of land, brought by appellants against the unknown heirs of F. H. Alley, and against appellees J. R. Beaty and A. W. Barfort, February 9, 1889. Thomas Jones and Mary Taylor and her husband C. W. Taylor intervened, and disclaimed as to certain lands described in the petition, and set up title to the remainder. Beaty set up exclusive title to 120 acres by metes and bounds, and Barfort to 220 acres out of the south half of the survey, and both disclaimed title to remainder of the survey. Both pleaded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Messner v. GiddingsTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mansions in the Forest, L.P. v. Montgomery CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2012

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API